Skip to content

SIGNAL

What the world tells you

A competitive deck is out of date the day it lands.

Research your competitors continuously instead of once a year, across the places your rivals are actually active, and get told where the gap is rather than just what they did.

Nobody here the whitespace Loud Specific Quiet Broad Rival A Rival B You Rival C Competitor names invented. Position is where the argument is.
Where each rival stands, and where nobody does. Illustrative, not a screenshot.

What Competitor Radar is

Competitor Radar researches the companies you compete with across the places your rivals are actually active and turns what it finds into a report you can act on. Per competitor you get their messaging themes and tone, their value propositions, the audiences they target, how their spend and attention split across channels, how their content performs, and a plain strengths and weaknesses read. Across all of them you get a comparison: who leads the category conversation, what everyone is saying, and where the gaps are. Competitors are suggested from your own brand profile, so you are not asked to list your rivals from memory.

The problem

The annual competitor audit nobody opens in month three.

Competitive research is usually a project: someone spends two weeks on it, produces forty slides, presents them once, and the deck ages out within a quarter. By the time a competitor changes their positioning or moves budget to a new channel, the document that would have told you is nine months old and living in a shared drive. The work was good. The format was the problem.

What you get

What each run produces

Who your rivals actually are

It proposes the competitor set from your own brand rather than making you guess, then you keep, cut or add to it.

Suggested, then yours

Share of the conversation

How much of the category each of you owns, tracked run over run rather than at a single point, so you see movement and not a snapshot.

Over time

Whitespace

The topics and positions nobody in the set is occupying. Usually the most useful page in the report, because it is cheaper to win an empty question than a contested one.

The gap, not the recap

Strengths and weaknesses, both ways

A worked read on each rival and on you against them, rather than a list of what they posted last week.

Per competitor

In practice

The useful answer is where nobody is standing

Share of the category conversation, this month Rival A 34% Rival B 28% You 22% Everyone else 16% Illustrative. Competitor names invented, tracked run over run rather than sampled once.
Tracking competitors one at a time tells you what each is doing. Tracking them together tells you what none of them is doing, which is the cheaper place to position.

Per competitor you get messaging, channel mix and an audience read. Across the set you get the comparison and the gap. Who to track is suggested from your own brand profile rather than from memory.

Coverage

Where it researches

Kind of source What that covers
Professional and socialWhat rivals say about themselves, and how often
CommunitiesWhat customers say about them, which is usually different
Video and long formWhere positioning is stated at length rather than in a caption
The open webSites, pricing pages and published material

Run over run, against one competitor set shared with listening and AI visibility, so the three cannot quietly disagree about who your rivals are.

Where it connects

What it feeds

  • Brand DNA suggests who to track, so the competitor set reflects how you position rather than who you happen to remember.
  • Social Listening tracks the same competitor names in the live conversation, so research and listening agree.
  • AEO/GEO Monitor shows which of them AI assistants name in answers to category questions, and which they do not.
  • Content Studio can brief against the whitespace, writing to the position nobody else is occupying.

Questions

Competitor Radar, answered

How many competitors can we track?

As many as are genuinely competitors. In practice most brands track between three and eight; beyond that the comparison stops being a comparison.

How is this different from a social listening tool?

Listening tells you what people are saying about a brand. This tells you what the brand itself is doing: its messaging, its channels, its positioning. Most brands need both, and here they share a competitor list.

How current is the data?

Each run reads live. You choose how often to run, and the comparison tracks movement between runs rather than treating each one as a fresh start.

Can it track private companies?

Yes. Public filings are one source of nine, and most of what matters for a consumer brand is public regardless of whether the company is listed.

Do you tell our competitors we are watching?

No. Everything read is publicly available material, read the way any person could read it.

See your category, mapped.

Tell us three competitors and we will have a comparison ready for the call.

Book a Demo